An interviewee that has requested to obscure their identity in a published article. This type of secrecy can raise skepticism from readers since they cannot determine the source's credibility for themselves

An interviewee that has requested to obscure their identity in a published article. This type of secrecy can raise skepticism from readers since they cannot determine the source's credibility for themselves

• A. Hidden Subject
• B. Anonymous Source
• C. Confidential Resource
• D. Private Interviewee

Answer: (B)

Anonymous sources are sources whose identities are not disclosed to readers. When someone requests anonymity in a published article, it protects the individual but makes it harder for readers to judge reliability because they cannot evaluate the source’s background, expertise, or motives for themselves. To keep credibility, the writer should corroborate the information with other sources, provide clear, non-identifying context about what was said or done, and attribute statements to the anonymous source with transparency about the level of corroboration. This approach helps readers assess the claim based on evidence rather than the person’s identity alone. The other terms don’t fit as well because they don’t capture the specific practice of withholding a source’s identity from the audience in a way that affects how readers judge credibility.

Anonymous sources are sources whose identities are not disclosed to readers. When someone requests anonymity in a published article, it protects the individual but makes it harder for readers to judge reliability because they cannot evaluate the source’s background, expertise, or motives for themselves. To keep credibility, the writer should corroborate the information with other sources, provide clear, non-identifying context about what was said or done, and attribute statements to the anonymous source with transparency about the level of corroboration. This approach helps readers assess the claim based on evidence rather than the person’s identity alone. The other terms don’t fit as well because they don’t capture the specific practice of withholding a source’s identity from the audience in a way that affects how readers judge credibility.